Just Built Different R Gymmemes From other's conversation,i found out they mentioned i was and sometimes they also mentioned i were. is there any rules for i was were?. What is the difference between "were" and "have been", and are these sentences gramatically correct? 1) some of the best known writers of detective fiction in the twentieth century were women.
I M Just Built Different R Memes Were ing (past continuous of be) is used to situations which were happening at a special time in the past and none hypothetical, it is more direct, not imaginative. I learned from many sources that as if it were is accepted by all native english speakers. and as if it was is widely used, especially informally. but is the simple present indicative accepted as. That is, both "were to" (using the irrealis "were") and "was to" (using a past tense verb) would usually be interchangeable in a sentence structured similar to yours, but that would be if the sentence was in non fiction text. Technically, you should use 'were'. you are correct that the sentence is subjunctive because of the indefiniteness introduced by 'as though'. the subjunctive takes the plural form of the past tense of 'to be' as its auxiliary verb, even in the singular. having said that, many expert native english speakers will use 'was', both formally and informally. if writing in a formal context, it might.
We Re Just Built Different R Callofcthulhumemes That is, both "were to" (using the irrealis "were") and "was to" (using a past tense verb) would usually be interchangeable in a sentence structured similar to yours, but that would be if the sentence was in non fiction text. Technically, you should use 'were'. you are correct that the sentence is subjunctive because of the indefiniteness introduced by 'as though'. the subjunctive takes the plural form of the past tense of 'to be' as its auxiliary verb, even in the singular. having said that, many expert native english speakers will use 'was', both formally and informally. if writing in a formal context, it might. Purdue owl has this example which is almost identical to op's case: one of the boxes is open. the verb agrees with the subject, "one". if you wanted to talk about "two", you would use a plural verb: two of the successful managers were asked. one of the successful managers was asked. But i cannot rule out the possibility that indian english—and specifically indian political english—has evolved this usage of were to precisely in order to express firmness and caution in the same utterance. perhaps our indian readers could speak to this. †this use is called subjunctive in traditional grammar. I'm in trouble with the following sentence: how was were the meals you had while you were gone? i think "how were" is correct, but why is "how was" wrong? please explain. Now, the body of the actress was to be flown in to india for her last rites. members from across the film fraternity had rushed to anil kapoor's home where the body was to be kept for final respects was to be flown or were to be flown i'm confused. is was to be flown grammatically correct here ?.
Comments are closed.