Publisher Theme
Art is not a luxury, but a necessity.

Section 8 Of Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996 Is An Exception To

Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996 Pdf Arbitration
Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996 Pdf Arbitration

Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996 Pdf Arbitration The implication here is that when a party takes such an objection to the maintainability of the suit, it need not file a separate application under section 8 of the act to convince the court regarding the non maintainability of the suit because of a binding arbitration clause between the parties. Section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, promotes the enforcement of arbitration agreements and limits judicial interference. however, its implementation requires judicial discipline and clarity in interpretation.

Application Under Section 8 Of The Arbitration And Conciliation Act
Application Under Section 8 Of The Arbitration And Conciliation Act

Application Under Section 8 Of The Arbitration And Conciliation Act Section 8 of the 1996 act denotes a provision which limits judicial intervention in the process of arbitration. however, the judiciary has drawn exception to the extent of intervention on the basis of the arbitrability of the subject matter and the competence of the arbitral tribunal to deal with it. In srinivas pai and anr. v. hv pai (d) thr. l.rs. and ors. the court held that the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 will not apply to civil disputes but domestic arbitration and international commercial disputes are all covered by the act. This article delves into this very practical issue through the lens of section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, exploring when and how it applies, the procedural safeguards involved, and how courts interpret it, especially after the 2015 amendment. The right to refer to arbitration once it is established cannot be defeated on technical grounds. the burden to establish that proceedings deserve to be stayed will be on the person who seeks stay and establishes the arbitration agreement.

Scope Of Section 8 17 Of The Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996
Scope Of Section 8 17 Of The Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996

Scope Of Section 8 17 Of The Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996 This article delves into this very practical issue through the lens of section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, exploring when and how it applies, the procedural safeguards involved, and how courts interpret it, especially after the 2015 amendment. The right to refer to arbitration once it is established cannot be defeated on technical grounds. the burden to establish that proceedings deserve to be stayed will be on the person who seeks stay and establishes the arbitration agreement. However, the judiciary has drawn exception to the extent of intervention on the basis of the arbitrability of the subject matter and the competence of the arbitral tribunal to deal with it. Indian courts have consistently upheld the enforceability of section 8 to promote arbitration. in madhu sudan sharma & ors. v. omaxe ltd. (2023), the delhi high court ruled that if a party invokes an arbitration clause, a separate application under section 8 is unnecessary. Article 8 enabled a court to decline to refer parties to arbitration if it is found that the arbitration agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed. section 8 has made a departure which is indicative of the wide reach and ambit of the statutory mandate. Section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘act’) deals with the power of the judicial authority to refer the parties to arbitration.

Section 8 Of Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996 Is An Exception To
Section 8 Of Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996 Is An Exception To

Section 8 Of Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996 Is An Exception To However, the judiciary has drawn exception to the extent of intervention on the basis of the arbitrability of the subject matter and the competence of the arbitral tribunal to deal with it. Indian courts have consistently upheld the enforceability of section 8 to promote arbitration. in madhu sudan sharma & ors. v. omaxe ltd. (2023), the delhi high court ruled that if a party invokes an arbitration clause, a separate application under section 8 is unnecessary. Article 8 enabled a court to decline to refer parties to arbitration if it is found that the arbitration agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed. section 8 has made a departure which is indicative of the wide reach and ambit of the statutory mandate. Section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘act’) deals with the power of the judicial authority to refer the parties to arbitration.

Comments are closed.