Publisher Theme
Art is not a luxury, but a necessity.

Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During

Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During
Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During

Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During Memory success tracked fluctuations in encoding–retrieval similarity across frontal and posterior cortices. importantly, memory effects in posterior regions reflected increased similarity between item specific representations during successful recognition. During encoding, stimulus specific patterns of functional inhibition and activation are modified in a context dependent manner. these patterns reoccur during successful memory retrieval,.

Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During
Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During

Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During Reading memory traces via encoding retrieval similarity during encoding, stimulus specific patterns of functional inhibition and activation are modified in a context dependent. A fundamental principle in memory research is that memory is a function of the similarity between encoding and retrieval operations. consistent with this principle, many neurobiological models of declarative memory assume that memory traces are stored in cortical regions, and the hippocampus facilitates the reactivation of these traces during retrieval. the present investigation tested the. By linking similarity to memory performance, we aim to identify regions in which neural pattern similarity to encoding is associated with retrieval success, likely arising from their par ticipation in operations whose recapitulation benefits memory. Memory success tracked fluctuations in encoding–retrieval similarity across frontal and posterior cortices. importantly, memory effects in posterior regions reflected increased similarity between item specific representations during successful recognition.

Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During
Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During

Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During By linking similarity to memory performance, we aim to identify regions in which neural pattern similarity to encoding is associated with retrieval success, likely arising from their par ticipation in operations whose recapitulation benefits memory. Memory success tracked fluctuations in encoding–retrieval similarity across frontal and posterior cortices. importantly, memory effects in posterior regions reflected increased similarity between item specific representations during successful recognition. In order to investigate how voluntary and involuntary memory retrieval reactivate representations that were established during encoding, we applied analyses of encoding retrieval similarity (ers) to eeg data (fig 2a). Using representational similarity analyses, we interrogated the similarity between activation patterns during encoding and retrieval both at the item level (individual scenes) and the set level (all scenes). the study yielded four main findings. In this work we were interested in exploring the neural markers associated to subsequent recognition when similar memories are subsequently encoded. we used a subsequent memory paradigm in which we manipulated the number of similar items within a category (2 or 6) that participants encoded. While several factors influence the accuracy of memory retrieval, including the availability of relevant cues, one particularly well studied factor is similarities between encoding and retrieval.

Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During
Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During

Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During In order to investigate how voluntary and involuntary memory retrieval reactivate representations that were established during encoding, we applied analyses of encoding retrieval similarity (ers) to eeg data (fig 2a). Using representational similarity analyses, we interrogated the similarity between activation patterns during encoding and retrieval both at the item level (individual scenes) and the set level (all scenes). the study yielded four main findings. In this work we were interested in exploring the neural markers associated to subsequent recognition when similar memories are subsequently encoded. we used a subsequent memory paradigm in which we manipulated the number of similar items within a category (2 or 6) that participants encoded. While several factors influence the accuracy of memory retrieval, including the availability of relevant cues, one particularly well studied factor is similarities between encoding and retrieval.

Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During
Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During

Reading Memory Traces Via Encoding Retrieval Similarity During In this work we were interested in exploring the neural markers associated to subsequent recognition when similar memories are subsequently encoded. we used a subsequent memory paradigm in which we manipulated the number of similar items within a category (2 or 6) that participants encoded. While several factors influence the accuracy of memory retrieval, including the availability of relevant cues, one particularly well studied factor is similarities between encoding and retrieval.

Events During The Encoding And Retrieval Phases Of The Source Memory
Events During The Encoding And Retrieval Phases Of The Source Memory

Events During The Encoding And Retrieval Phases Of The Source Memory

Comments are closed.